nginx-0.7.48-RELEASE
diff --git a/docs/xml/nginx/changes.xml b/docs/xml/nginx/changes.xml
index 7167182..405510c 100644
--- a/docs/xml/nginx/changes.xml
+++ b/docs/xml/nginx/changes.xml
@@ -9,6 +9,82 @@
<title lang="en">nginx changelog</title>
+<changes ver="0.7.48" date="06.04.2009">
+
+<change type="feature">
+<para lang="ru">
+ÄÉÒÅËÔÉ×Á proxy_cache_key.
+</para>
+<para lang="en">
+the "proxy_cache_key" directive.
+</para>
+</change>
+
+<change type="bugfix">
+<para lang="ru">
+ÔÅÐÅÒØ nginx ÕÞÉÔÙ×ÁÅÔ ÐÒÉ ËÜÛÉÒÏ×ÁÎÉÉ ÓÔÒÏËÉ "X-Accel-Expires",
+"Expires" É "Cache-Control" × ÚÁÇÏÌÏ×ËÅ ÏÔ×ÅÔÁ ÂÜËÅÎÄÁ.
+</para>
+<para lang="en">
+now nginx takes into account the "X-Accel-Expires", "Expires", and
+"Cache-Control" header lines in a backend response.
+</para>
+</change>
+
+<change type="bugfix">
+<para lang="ru">
+ÔÅÐÅÒØ nginx ËÜÛÉÒÕÅÔ ÔÏÌØËÏ ÏÔ×ÅÔÙ ÎÁ ÚÁÐÒÏÓÙ GET.
+</para>
+<para lang="en">
+now nginx caches responses for the GET requests only.
+</para>
+</change>
+
+<change type="bugfix">
+<para lang="ru">
+ÄÉÒÅËÔÉ×Á fastcgi_cache_key ÎÅ ÎÁÓÌÅÄÏ×ÁÌÁÓØ.
+</para>
+<para lang="en">
+the "fastcgi_cache_key" directive was not inherited.
+</para>
+</change>
+
+<change type="bugfix">
+<para lang="ru">
+ÐÅÒÅÍÅÎÎÙÅ $arg_... ÎÅ ÒÁÂÏÔÁÌÉ Ó SSI-ÐÏÄÚÁÐÒÏÓÁÍÉ.<br/>
+óÐÁÓÉÂÏ íÁËÓÉÍÕ äÕÎÉÎÕ.
+</para>
+<para lang="en">
+the $arg_... variables did not work with SSI subrequests.<br/>
+Thanks to Maxim Dounin.
+</para>
+</change>
+
+<change type="bugfix">
+<para lang="ru">
+nginx ÎÅ ÓÏÂÉÒÁÌÓÑ Ó ÂÉÂÌÉÏÔÅËÏÊ uclibc.<br/>
+óÐÁÓÉÂÏ Timothy Redaelli.
+</para>
+<para lang="en">
+nginx could not be built with uclibc library.<br/>
+Thanks to Timothy Redaelli.
+</para>
+</change>
+
+<change type="bugfix">
+<para lang="ru">
+nginx ÎÅ ÓÏÂÉÒÁÌÓÑ ÎÁ OpenBSD;
+ÏÛÉÂËÁ ÐÏÑ×ÉÌÁÓØ <nobr>× 0.7.46.</nobr>
+</para>
+<para lang="en">
+nginx could not be built on OpenBSD;
+the bug had <nobr>appeared in 0.7.46.</nobr>
+</para>
+</change>
+
+</changes>
+
+
<changes ver="0.7.47" date="01.04.2009">
<change type="bugfix">
@@ -634,7 +710,7 @@
</para>
<para lang="en">
in a redirect rewrite directive original arguments were concatenated with
-new arguments by an "?" rather than an "&";<br/>
+new arguments by a "?" rather than an "&";<br/>
the bug had appeared in 0.1.18.<br/>
Thanks to Maxim Dounin.
</para>
@@ -11746,7 +11822,7 @@
</para>
<para lang="en">
in a redirect rewrite directive arguments were concatenated with URI
-by an "&" rather than an "?".
+by an "&" rather than a "?".
</para>
</change>