nginx-0.5.37-RELEASE
diff --git a/docs/xml/nginx/changes.xml b/docs/xml/nginx/changes.xml
index a5ab901..ae1386d 100644
--- a/docs/xml/nginx/changes.xml
+++ b/docs/xml/nginx/changes.xml
@@ -9,6 +9,74 @@
 <title lang="en">nginx changelog</title>
 
 
+<changes ver="0.5.37" date="07.07.2008">
+
+<change type="bugfix">
+<para lang="ru">
+ÐÒÉ ÓÏ×ÍÅÓÔÎÏÍ ÉÓÐÏÌØÚÏ×ÁÎÉÉ sub_filter É SSI
+ÏÔ×ÅÔÙ ÍÏÇÌÉ ÐÅÒÅÄÁ×ÁÔØÓÑ ÎÅ×ÅÒÎÏ.
+</para>
+<para lang="en">
+if sub_filter and SSI were used together, then responses might
+were transferred incorrectly.
+</para>
+</change>
+
+<change type="bugfix">
+<para lang="ru">
+ÂÏÌØÛÉÅ ×ËÌÀÞÅÎÉÑ × SSI ÍÏÇÌÉ ÐÅÒÅÄÁ×ÁÌÉÓØ ÎÅ ÐÏÌÎÏÓÔØÀ.
+</para>
+<para lang="en">
+large SSI inclusions might be truncated.
+</para>
+</change>
+
+<change type="bugfix">
+<para lang="ru">
+ÒÁÂÏÞÉÅ ÐÒÏÃÅÓÓÙ ÍÏÇÌÉ ÎÅ ÒÅÁÇÉÒÏ×ÁÔØ ÎÁ ÓÉÇÎÁÌÙ ÐÅÒÅËÏÎÆÉÇÕÒÁÃÉÉ
+É ÒÏÔÁÃÉÉ ÌÏÇÏ×.
+</para>
+<para lang="en">
+worker processes might not catch reconfiguration and log rotation signals.
+</para>
+</change>
+
+<change type="bugfix">
+<para lang="ru">
+nginx ÎÅ ÓÏÂÉÒÁÌÓÑ ÎÁ ÐÏÓÌÅÄÎÉÈ Fedora 9 Linux.<br/>
+óÐÁÓÉÂÏ Roxis.
+</para>
+<para lang="en">
+nginx could not be built on latest Fedora 9 Linux.<br/>
+Thanks to Roxis.
+</para>
+</change>
+
+<change type="bugfix">
+<para lang="ru">
+ÐÒÉ ÉÓÐÏÌØÚÏ×ÁÎÉÉ keepalive ÎÁ Linux
+× ÒÁÂÏÞÅÍ ÐÒÏÃÅÓÓÅ ÍÏÇ ÐÒÏÉÚÏÊÔÉ segmentation fault.
+</para>
+<para lang="en">
+a segmentation fault might occur in worker process on Linux,
+if keepalive was enabled.
+</para>
+</change>
+
+<change type="bugfix">
+<para lang="ru">
+×Ï ×ÒÅÍÑ ÐÅÒÅËÏÎÆÉÇÕÒÁÃÉÉ ÎÁ ÎÅËÏÔÏÒÙÈ 64-ÂÉÔÎÏÍ ÐÌÁÔÆÏÒÍÁÈ × ÌÏÇ
+ÚÁÐÉÓÙ×ÁÌÓÑ alert "sendmsg() failed (9: Bad file descriptor)".
+</para>
+<para lang="en">
+an alert "sendmsg() failed (9: Bad file descriptor)" on some 64-bit platforms
+while reconfiguration.
+</para>
+</change>
+
+</changes>
+
+
 <changes ver="0.5.36" date="04.05.2008">
 
 <change type="bugfix">
@@ -48,7 +116,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 nginx issued the bogus error message "SSL_shutdown() failed (SSL: )";
-bug appeared in 0.5.35.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.35.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -59,7 +127,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 in HTTPS mode requests might fail with the "bad write retry" error;
-bug appeared in 0.5.35.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.35.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -86,7 +154,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 a segmentation fault occurred in master process
 if the "fastcgi_catch_stderr" directive was used;
-bug appeared in 0.5.32.<br/>
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.32.<br/>
 Thanks to Manlio Perillo.
 </para>
 </change>
@@ -136,7 +204,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 in HTTPS mode requests might fail with the "bad write retry" error;
-bug appeared in 0.5.13.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.13.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -194,7 +262,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 if the "?" character was in a "error_page" directive, then it was escaped
 in a proxied request;
-bug appeared in 0.5.32.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.32.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -293,7 +361,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 URL double escaping in a redirect of the "msie_refresh" directive;
-bug appeared in 0.5.28.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.28.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -511,7 +579,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 nginx supported low case only "close" and "keep-alive" values
 in the "Connection" request header line;
-bug appeared in 0.5.32.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.32.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -748,7 +816,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 the "proxy_ignore_client_abort" and "fastcgi_ignore_client_abort" directives
 did not work;
-bug appeared in 0.5.13.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.13.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -856,7 +924,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 fix building on Solaris/amd64 by Sun Studio 11 and early versions;
-bug appeared in 0.5.29.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.29.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -1003,6 +1071,7 @@
 </changes>
 
 
+<!-- 0.6.x branch -->
 <changes ver="0.5.25" date="11.06.2007">
 
 <change type="bugfix">
@@ -1012,7 +1081,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 nginx could not be built with the --without-http_rewrite_module parameter;
-bug appeared in 0.5.24.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.24.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -1039,7 +1108,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 a part of response body might be passed uncompressed if gzip was used;
-bug appeared in 0.5.23.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.23.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -1113,7 +1182,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 a big request body might not be passed to backend;
-bug appeared in 0.5.21.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.21.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -1350,7 +1419,7 @@
 after first reconfiguration and receiving any signal
 if nginx was built with ngx_http_perl_module and perl
 did not support multiplicity;
-bug appeared in 0.5.9.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.9.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -1363,7 +1432,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 if perl did not support multiplicity, then after reconfiguration
 perl code did not work;
-bug appeared in 0.3.38.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.38.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -1449,7 +1518,7 @@
 a segmentation fault might occur in worker process
 if a charset was set in the "Content-Type" header line and the line
 has trailing ";";
-bug appeared in 0.3.50.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.50.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -1471,7 +1540,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 nginx could not be built on Solaris without the --with-debug option;
-bug appeared in 0.5.15.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.15.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -1648,8 +1717,9 @@
 ÏÛÉÂËÁ ÐÏÑ×ÉÌÁÓØ × 0.5.8.
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
-nginx could not be built on platforms different from i386, amd64, sparc and ppc;
-bug appeared in 0.5.8.
+nginx could not be built on platforms different from i386, amd64, sparc,
+and ppc;
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.8.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -1664,8 +1734,9 @@
 ÏÛÉÂËÁ ÐÏÑ×ÉÌÁÓØ × 0.5.8.
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
-nginx could not be built on platforms different from i386, amd64, sparc É ppc;
-bug appeared in 0.5.8.
+nginx could not be built on platforms different from i386, amd64, sparc,
+and ppc;
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.8.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -1678,7 +1749,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 a segmentation fault might occur in worker process
 if the temporarily files were used while working with FastCGI server;
-bug appeared in 0.5.8.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.8.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -1725,7 +1796,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 the response was incorrect if several ranges were requested;
-bug appeared in 0.5.6.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.6.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -1777,7 +1848,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 while online executable file upgrade the new master process did not
 inherit the listening sockets;
-bug appeared in 0.5.9.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.9.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -1790,7 +1861,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 a segmentation fault might occur in worker process
 if nginx was built with -O2 optimization;
-bug appeared in 0.5.1.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.1.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -1909,7 +1980,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 if the "proxy_buffering off" directive was used and a client connection
 was non-active, then the connection was closed after send timeout;
-bug appeared in 0.4.7.
+the bug had appeared in 0.4.7.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -2176,7 +2247,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 a segmentation fault might occur if the $host variable was used;
-bug appeared in 0.4.14.
+the bug had appeared in 0.4.14.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -2229,7 +2300,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 if the "proxy_pass" directive used the name of the "upstream" block,
 then nginx tried to resolve the name;
-bug appeared in 0.5.1.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.1.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -2256,7 +2327,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 for Eudora for Mac;
-bug appeared in 0.4.11.<br/>
+the bug had appeared in 0.4.11.<br/>
 Thanks to Bron Gondwana.
 </para>
 </change>
@@ -2270,7 +2341,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 if the "upstream" name was used in the "fastcgi_pass", then the message
 "no port in upstream" was issued;
-bug appeared in 0.5.0.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.0.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -2284,7 +2355,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 if the "proxy_pass" and "fastcgi_pass" directives used the same servers but
 different ports, then these directives uses the first described port;
-bug appeared in 0.5.0.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.0.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -2297,7 +2368,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 if the "proxy_pass" and "fastcgi_pass" directives used the unix domain sockets,
 then these directives used first described socket;
-bug appeared in 0.5.0.
+the bug had appeared in 0.5.0.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -2393,7 +2464,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 nginx could not be built on 64-bit platforms;
-bug appeared in 0.4.14.
+the bug had appeared in 0.4.14.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -2427,7 +2498,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 ngx_http_perl_module did not work with perl built with the threads support;
-bug appeared in 0.3.38.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.38.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -2545,7 +2616,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 a charset could not be set for ngx_http_autoindex_module responses;
-bug appeared in 0.3.50.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.50.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -2576,7 +2647,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 the 50th subrequest in SSI response did not work;
-bug appeared in 0.3.50.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.50.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -2646,7 +2717,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 if the APOP was enabled in the POP3 proxy, then the USER/PASS commands
 might not work;
-bug appeared in 0.4.10.
+the bug had appeared in 0.4.10.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -2693,7 +2764,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 the ngx_http_flv_module did not support the byte ranges for full responses;
-bug appeared in 0.4.7.
+the bug had appeared in 0.4.7.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -2704,7 +2775,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 nginx could not be built on Debian amd64;
-bug appeared in 0.4.9.
+the bug had appeared in 0.4.9.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -2857,7 +2928,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 after redirecting error by an "error_page" directive
 any ngx_http_rewrite_module directive returned this error code;
-bug appeared in 0.4.4.
+the bug had appeared in 0.4.4.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -2873,7 +2944,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 nginx could not be built on Linux and Solaris;
-bug appeared in 0.4.4.
+the bug had appeared in 0.4.4.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -2995,7 +3066,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 a segmentation fault occurred if an unix domain socket was used in
 a "proxy_pass" directive;
-bug appeared in 0.3.47.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.47.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -3030,7 +3101,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 the O_NOATIME flag support on Linux was canceled;
-bug appeared in 0.4.1.
+the bug had appeared in 0.4.1.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -3135,7 +3206,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 a segmentation fault occurred if there was an "index" directive with
 variables and the first index name was without variables;
-bug appeared in 0.1.29.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.29.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -3195,7 +3266,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 a worker process may got caught in an endless loop
 while an error redirection;
-bug appeared in 0.3.59.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.59.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -3231,7 +3302,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 the "error_page" directive did not changes the "Content-Type" header line
 after the "X-Accel-Redirect" was used;
-bug appeared in 0.3.58.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.58.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -3465,7 +3536,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 on some condition while reconfiguration character codes
 inside the "charset_map" may be treated invalid;
-bug appeared in 0.3.50.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.50.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -3532,7 +3603,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 nginx could not be built on amd64 platform;
-bug appeared in 0.3.53.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.53.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -3632,7 +3703,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 the worker process may got caught in an endless loop if the limit rate was used;
-bug appeared in 0.3.37.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.37.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -3645,7 +3716,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 ngx_http_charset_module logged "unknown charset" alert, even if the recoding
 was not needed;
-bug appeared in 0.3.50.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.50.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -3672,7 +3743,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 the "&lt;" symbols might disappeared some conditions in the SSI;
-bug appeared in 0.3.50.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.50.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -3816,7 +3887,7 @@
 the internal redirect always transform client's HTTP method to GET,
 now the transformation is made for the "X-Accel-Redirect" redirects only
 and if the method is not HEAD;
-bug appeared in 0.3.42.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.42.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -3828,7 +3899,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 the ngx_http_perl_module could not be built, if the perl was built
 with the threads support;
-bug appeared in 0.3.46.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.46.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -3940,7 +4011,7 @@
 × ÔÁÂÌÉÃÕ ÐÅÒÅËÏÄÉÒÏ×ËÉ koi-win ÄÏÂÁ×ÌÅÎÙ ÓÉÍ×ÏÌÙ Å×ÒÏ É ÎÏÍÅÒÁ.
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
-the euro É N symbols were added to koi-win conversion table.
+the euro and N symbols were added to koi-win conversion table.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -4175,7 +4246,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 the active connection counter increased on the exceeding of the connection
 limit specified by the "worker_connections" directive;
-bug appeared in 0.2.0.
+the bug had appeared in 0.2.0.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -4186,7 +4257,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 the limit rate might not work on some condition;
-bug appeared in 0.3.38.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.38.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -4422,7 +4493,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 the accept-filter and the TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT option were set for first "listen"
 directive only;
-bug appeared in 0.3.31.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.31.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -4496,7 +4567,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 the debug logging on startup and reconfiguration time was removed;
-bug appeared in 0.3.31.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.31.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -4555,7 +4626,7 @@
 if there were several "listen" directives listening one various addresses
 inside one server, then server names like "*.domain.tld" worked for first
 address only;
-bug appeared in 0.3.18.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.18.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -4610,7 +4681,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 nginx could not be built on i386 platform, if the PIC was used;
-bug appeared in 0.3.27.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.27.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -4843,7 +4914,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 the segmentation fault was occurred on start or while reconfiguration
 if there was invalid configuration;
-bug appeared in 0.3.24.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.24.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -4898,7 +4969,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 on 64-bit platforms segmentation fault may occurred on start
 if the many names were used in the "server_name" directives;
-bug appeared in 0.3.18.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.18.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -4966,7 +5037,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 segmentation fault was occurred if the "none" or "blocked" values was
 specified in the "valid_referers" directive;
-bug appeared in 0.3.18.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.18.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -5127,7 +5198,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 segmentation fault was occurred if configuration file did not exist;
-bug appeared in 0.3.12.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.12.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -5138,7 +5209,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 on 64-bit platforms segmentation fault may occurred on start;
-bug appeared in 0.3.16.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.16.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -5172,7 +5243,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 the timeouts were not used in SSL handshake;
-bug appeared in 0.2.4.
+the bug had appeared in 0.2.4.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -5267,7 +5338,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 nginx did not close connection to IMAP/POP3 backend for the SSL
 connections;
-bug appeared in 0.3.13.<br/>
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.13.<br/>
 Thanks to Rob Mueller.
 </para>
 </change>
@@ -5279,7 +5350,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 segmentation fault may occurred in at SSL shutdown;
-bug appeared in 0.3.13.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.13.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -5329,7 +5400,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 in the 304 response the body was transferred;
-bug appeared in 0.3.13.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.13.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -5383,7 +5454,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 the "auth_basic" directive did not disable the authorization;
-bug appeared in 0.3.11.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.11.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -5450,7 +5521,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 the changes in accept mutex  handling when the "rtsig" method was used;
-bug appeared in 0.3.0.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.0.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -5486,7 +5557,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 if the "combined" format was explicitly specified in the "access_log" directive,
 then the empty lines was written to the log;
-bug appeared in 0.3.8.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.8.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -5522,7 +5593,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 nginx did not pass the client request headers and body while proxying;
-bug appeared in 0.3.10.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.10.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -5658,7 +5729,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 nginx considered URI as unsafe if two any symbols was between two slashes;
-bug appeared in 0.3.8.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.8.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -5792,7 +5863,7 @@
 if the request URI was changes by the "rewrite" directive and the request
 was proxied in location given by regular expression, then the incorrect
 request was transferred to backend;
-bug appeared in 0.2.6.
+the bug had appeared in 0.2.6.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -5856,8 +5927,9 @@
 ÏÛÉÂËÁ ÐÏÑ×ÉÌÁÓØ × 0.3.2.
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
-nginx could not be built on platforms different from i386, amd64, sparc É ppc;
-bug appeared in 0.3.2.
+nginx could not be built on platforms different from i386, amd64, sparc,
+and ppc;
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.2.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -5893,7 +5965,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 if at least in one server was no the "listen" directive, then nginx did not
 listen on the 80 port;
-bug appeared in 0.3.3.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.3.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -5921,7 +5993,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 the segmentation fault may occurred if the IMAP/POP3 login was changed
 by authorization server;
-bug appeared in 0.2.2.
+the bug had appeared in 0.2.2.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -5932,7 +6004,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 the accept mutex did not work and all connections were handled by one process;
-bug appeared in 0.3.3.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.3.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -5959,7 +6031,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 nginx could not be built on Linux 2.4+ and MacOS X;
-bug appeared in 0.3.3.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.3.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -6028,7 +6100,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 the mime type may be incorrectly set to default value for index file with
 variable in the name;
-bug appeared in 0.3.0.
+the bug had appeared in 0.3.0.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -6138,7 +6210,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 the segmentation fault occurred when the signal queue overflowed
 if the "rtsig" method was used;
-bug appeared in 0.2.0.
+the bug had appeared in 0.2.0.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -6238,7 +6310,7 @@
 if the "set" directive set the ngx_http_geo_module variable in some
 configuration part, the this variable was not available in other
 configuration parts and the "using uninitialized variable" error was occurred;
-bug appeared in 0.2.2.
+the bug had appeared in 0.2.2.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -6312,7 +6384,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 in proxying location without trailing slash;
-bug appeared in 0.1.44.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.44.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -6323,7 +6395,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 the segmentation fault may occurred if the "rtsig" method was used;
-bug appeared in 0.2.0.
+the bug had appeared in 0.2.0.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -6339,7 +6411,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 nginx could not be built without the --with-debug option;
-bug appeared in 0.2.2.
+the bug had appeared in 0.2.2.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -6431,7 +6503,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 if all backend using in load-balancing failed after one error, then
 nginx may got caught in an endless loop;
-bug appeared in 0.2.0.
+the bug had appeared in 0.2.0.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -6691,7 +6763,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 the segmentation fault may occurred if there were errors while
 working with proxied or FastCGI server;
-in the proxied mode the bug appeared in 0.1.29.
+in the proxied mode the the bug had appeared in 0.1.29.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -6708,7 +6780,7 @@
 the segmentation fault occurred or the worker process may got caught
 in an endless loop if the proxied or FastCGI server sent the "Cache-Control"
 header line and the "expires" directive was used;
-in the proxied mode the bug appeared in 0.1.29.
+in the proxied mode the the bug had appeared in 0.1.29.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -6737,7 +6809,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 the "limit_rate" directive did not work inside the "if" block;
-bug appeared in 0.1.38.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.38.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -6781,7 +6853,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 the "Set-Cookie" header line was not transferred when the "X-Accel-Redirect"
 was used;
-bug appeared in 0.1.39.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.39.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -6856,7 +6928,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 the ngx_http_proxy_module and ngx_http_fastcgi_module may close
 a connection before anything was transferred to a client;
-bug appeared in 0.1.38.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.38.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -6889,7 +6961,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 if the backend response had the "Location" header line and nginx
 should not rewrite this line, then the 500 code response body was transferred;
-bug appeared in 0.1.29.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.29.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -6902,7 +6974,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 some directives of the ngx_http_proxy_module and ngx_http_fastcgi_module
 were not inherited from the server to the location level;
-bug appeared in 0.1.29.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.29.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -6922,7 +6994,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 the ngx_http_autoindex_module did not show correctly the long file names;
-bug appeared in 0.1.38.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.38.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -7018,7 +7090,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 nginx treated the backend response as invalid if the status line in the
 header was transferred in two packets;
-bug appeared in 0.1.29.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.29.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -7201,7 +7273,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 the segmentation fault was occurred if the backend response header was in
 several packets;
-bug appeared in 0.1.29.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.29.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -7237,7 +7309,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 nginx returned the 400 response on requests like
 <nobr>"GET http://www.domain.com/uri HTTP/1.0"</nobr>;
-bug appeared in 0.1.28.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.28.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -7296,7 +7368,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 nginx could not be built with the --without-pcre parameter;
-bug appeared in 0.1.29.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.29.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -7343,7 +7415,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 the arguments were omitted in the redirects, issued by the "rewrite" directive;
-bug appeared in 0.1.29.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.29.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -7416,7 +7488,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 the redirect with the 301 code was transferred without response body;
-bug appeared in 0.1.30.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.30.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -7452,7 +7524,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 if the length of the response part received at once from proxied
 or FastCGI server was equal to 500, then nginx returns the 500 response code;
-in proxy mode the bug appeared in 0.1.29 only.
+in proxy mode the the bug had appeared in 0.1.29 only.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -7735,7 +7807,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 the segmentation fault was occurred if the backend sent an invalid line
 in response header;
-bug appeared in 0.1.26.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.26.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -8125,8 +8197,9 @@
 ÏÛÉÂËÁ ÐÏÑ×ÉÌÁÓØ × 0.1.22.
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
-nginx could not be built on platforms different from i386, amd64, sparc É ppc;
-bug appeared in 0.1.22.
+nginx could not be built on platforms different from i386, amd64, sparc,
+and ppc;
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.22.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -8176,7 +8249,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 the installation paths were incorrectly quoted on Linux and Solaris;
-bug appeared in 0.1.21.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.21.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -8455,7 +8528,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 if in a proxied "Location" header was a relative URL,
 then a host name and a slash were added to them;
-bug appeared in 0.1.14.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.14.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -8541,7 +8614,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 the response code 400 was returned for the POST request with the
 "Content-Length: 0" header;
-bug appeared in 0.1.14.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.14.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -8614,7 +8687,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 the directive <nobr>"proxy_preserve_host  on"</nobr> adds port 80
 to the "Host" headers, if upstream listen on port 80;
-bug appeared in 0.1.14.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.14.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -8715,7 +8788,7 @@
 </para>
 <para lang="en">
 the "[alert] zero size buf" error;
-bug appeared in 0.1.3.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.3.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -8984,7 +9057,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 if the request without arguments contains "//", "/./", "/../" or "%XX"
 then the lost character in the request line was lost;
-bug appeared in 0.1.9.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.9.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -9041,7 +9114,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 while the build configuration on Linux the --with-poll_module parameter
 was required;
-bug appeared in 0.1.8.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.8.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -9091,7 +9164,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 on FreeBSD the segmentation fault may occur if the size of the transferred
 file was changed;
-bug appeared in 0.1.5.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.5.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -9285,7 +9358,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 if configuration file was set in command line, the reconfiguration
 was impossible;
-bug appeared in 0.1.1.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.1.
 </para>
 </change>
 
@@ -9308,7 +9381,7 @@
 <para lang="en">
 with sendfile the response was not recoded according to the charset
 module directives;
-bug appeared in 0.1.1.
+the bug had appeared in 0.1.1.
 </para>
 </change>